The insurer hides behind a clause you never signed, the airline claims extraordinary circumstances, the telecoms operator bills you for a lock-in you do not remember agreeing to, or the electricity supplier back-bills a whole year in one go. Our consumer lawyers first check whether there is a body that decides quickly and free of charge and, above all, whether its decision binds the company. When it does not, or when the company refuses to take part, the claim goes to court with the legal grounds set out in writing.

We attack the exclusion where it was not highlighted and separately signed as art. 3 of Insurance Contract Act 50/1980 requires, and we also claim the insurer's default interest under art. 20, which grows with every year that passes.
The insurer is released only where there was fraud or gross fault and where it asked specific questions. If the questionnaire was generic, the benefit is reduced proportionately but not lost (arts. 10 and 89 of the Insurance Contract Act).
A technical fault and a strike by the airline's own staff do not excuse it, and the burden of proving the cause lies with the carrier (arts. 5.3 and 7 of Regulation EC 261/2004).
We challenge the validity of the lock-in and how the penalty was calculated, and file with the OAUT (the Spanish telecoms user office) within three months, with the number port already requested.
Back-billing for a metering error is capped at one year and must be split into as many instalments as the error lasted months. It is challenged before the regional authority, which also stops the cut-off and the surcharge (art. 96 of Royal Decree 1955/2000).
This is not the guarantee, it is producer liability: the claim goes against the manufacturer or the importer for personal injury and property damage, within three years of the harm and ten of the product being put into circulation (arts. 128 onwards of the Spanish Consumer Act).
Arbitration is voluntary for the company, so without its adherence the route is the small claims track, having first evidenced the attempt to negotiate required by Organic Act 1/2025.
We start with the contract and with what the company put in writing, which rarely matches what you were told on the phone. Then we choose the forum: your regional consumer authority, the OAUT telecoms user office, the insurance supervisor or arbitration, knowing in advance which of them binds the company and which merely recommends. If the administrative route does not close the matter, we sue, and since April 2025 a prior attempt to settle must be evidenced before a civil claim is filed (art. 5 of Organic Act 1/2025), a requirement that gets claims thrown out when it is done badly. We tell you from the outset how much can be recovered and whether it is worth pursuing.
Your matter is quoted after the consultation, because every case is different. The consultation fee is credited in full against the engagement if you go ahead.
We tell you with figures in the consultation, and sometimes the answer is no. When it is worth it, that is usually because default interest has piled up, because the same error repeats across several bills, or because the company backs down as soon as a reasoned letter arrives on a law firm's letterhead.
It works as proof that you complained and when, and in some regions it triggers an inspection of the company. What it does not do is force the company to pay you: for that there is arbitration, if the company has signed up to it, and failing that the courts.
It depends: two years for property insurance and five for personal insurance, five years for contractual claims under the Civil Code, including flight claims in Spain, and three years from the harm where the product was defective. It is the first thing we check, because an expired deadline cannot be fixed.
The matter is quoted after the initial consultation, which is 100 euros for thirty minutes or 200 euros for a full hour and is credited in full if you instruct us. You leave that consultation with the route chosen and a realistic figure for what can be recovered.
The dispute explained: what action lies, what deadline is running and what has to be proved.