Clarifying, correcting or completing a Spanish judgment: the remedies in arts. 214 and 215 LEC

Last updated 3 August 2026 · Reviewed by Jaime Piñeira Pardo, lawyer registered with the ICAM bar, no. 138826 · English version of our Spanish guide.

If a judgment has an unclear passage, a clerical error or leaves a claim unresolved, you do not always need to appeal: arts. 214 and 215 LEC (the Spanish Civil Procedure Act) let you ask the same court to clarify it (2 working days), correct clerical errors (any time) or complete it (5 days). Managora drafts the application and keeps track of the deadline. The ruling itself, though, cannot be changed by this route.

We handle the whole procedure for you, from start to finish.

You describe your case in a chat and sign; we file it with the Spanish authorities. Fixed price from €36.00 (21% VAT included), plus the tasa (official fee) where there is one.

See the procedure

What is new, and the law that applies

  • Arts. 214 and 215 LEC in force as at 3 August 2026: the major recent procedural reforms (Real Decreto-ley 6/2023, a Spanish decree law in force since 20 March 2024, and Ley Organica 1/2025, a Spanish organic act in force since 3 April 2025) have not altered these provisions or their 2 and 5 day deadlines.
  • Art. 267.9 LOPJ keeps the counting rule: the deadline to appeal the original decision begins, in every case, on the day after notification of the auto that decides the clarification, correction, cure or completion.
  • Remember the procedural calendar: August is a non-working month (art. 130.2 LEC and art. 183 LOPJ), so the 2 and 5 day deadlines do not run during that month except for urgent steps.

What can I do if a Spanish judgment has an error or leaves something out?

The general rule is invariability: a court cannot change its own decision once it has been signed (art. 214.1 LEC). But the law itself opens four fast remedies, before the same court that issued the decision and with no need to appeal: clarification of unclear wording, correction of clerical and arithmetical errors, cure of omissions or defects that prevent the decision from being carried out, and completion of claims that were left unresolved (what Spanish procedure calls incongruencia omisiva, a failure to rule on a point that was raised).

They are not appeals: no higher court decides them, they carry no tasa (official fee) and no deposit, and they are handled far faster than an appeal. They work for sentencias (judgments) and autos (reasoned court orders), and also for the decretos issued by the Letrado de la Administracion de Justicia, the senior court clerk who runs the procedural side of a case (arts. 214.2 and 215.4 LEC). In the other court jurisdictions the equivalent rule is art. 267 LOPJ.

Everything turns on choosing the right remedy and acting in time: two of the four expire within 2 or 5 working days of notification.

What is the deadline for each request and when does it start running?

Clarification of an unclear point and the cure of omissions or defects must be requested within the 2 working days following notification of the decision (arts. 214.2 and 215.1 LEC). Completion of a missing ruling has 5 working days from notification (art. 215.2 LEC). Obvious clerical errors and arithmetical errors are the exception: they can be corrected at any time, even when the judgment is already final (art. 214.3 LEC).

Deadlines are counted in working days: Saturdays, Sundays, public holidays and the whole of August are excluded, because August does not count for procedural purposes except for urgent steps (art. 130.2 LEC and art. 183 LOPJ).

The court has deadlines too: a clarification requested by a party must be decided within the 3 days following the filing of the application (art. 214.2 LEC). In a completion, the Letrado de la Administracion de Justicia passes your request to the other parties, who have 5 days for written submissions (alegaciones), and the court then issues an auto granting or refusing it (art. 215.2 LEC). The court may also complete its own decision on its own initiative within 5 days of issuing it (art. 215.3 LEC).

Does the appeal deadline stop while the court decides?

Yes. An application for clarification, correction, cure or completion interrupts the deadline for any appeal available against the decision (art. 215.5 LEC and art. 267.9 LOPJ). Art. 267.9 LOPJ adds that, in every case, the appeal period starts to run on the day after notification of the auto that decides the request, whether it grants it or refuses it.

Be careful about using this route only to gain time: the case law has warned that a manifestly improper request, filed for the sole purpose of stretching the appeal deadline, may not produce that interrupting effect. That is why the application has to identify a real defect and fit it into the correct article.

A prudent tip: if you already know you are going to appeal, do not cut it fine. Prepare the appeal in parallel and count the deadline from notification of the auto, not from the judgment.

What can clarification or completion never achieve?

They can never be used to change the ruling, to re-assess the evidence or to correct a point of law. The invariability rule in art. 214.1 LEC has constitutional weight: the Tribunal Constitucional (Spain's Constitutional Court) quashed a clarification order that altered an award of costs on the pretext of correcting a clerical error, because that meant changing what had been decided, not clarifying it (STC 185/2008).

The practical dividing line: a sum done wrong or transposed figures is an arithmetical error and can be corrected at any time; finding the percentage or the criterion applied unfair is a disagreement on the merits and calls for an appeal. Nor is this the route for questions that belong to the enforcement of the judgment: courts reject them and refer them to enforcement proceedings.

No appeal at all lies against the auto that decides a clarification, correction, cure or completion (arts. 214.4 and 215.5 LEC); what you can appeal is the original judgment or order, within its own deadline.

How is the application drafted and where do you file it?

There is no official standard form: it is a party's written application addressed to the same court that issued the decision. It has to identify the proceedings and the case number, the decision concerned and the date it was notified, the exact passage where the defect lies, the article that supports the request (214 or 215 LEC) and, strongly advisable, the precise wording you propose.

If a procurador (a court agent who files documents in the case on your behalf) is involved in your proceedings, because representation is compulsory under art. 23 LEC, he or she files it electronically in the case file that is already open. If representation is not compulsory, you can file it yourself at the court's own registry.

Managora drafts the application for you, checks which of the four remedies fits your case and keeps track of the 2 or 5 day deadline. The service does not include legal representation in court: we do not provide a procurador and we do not appear at hearings. You can see the current price on the service page; there is no court tasa.

What mistakes do people make most with arts. 214 and 215 LEC?

The most frequent one: asking through a clarification for something that requires an appeal. If what you want is for the judge to change what was decided, the request will be refused and valuable time will have been lost. The second: confusing completion (5 days) with clarification (2 days) and filing the wrong remedy out of time.

It is also a mistake to let the appeal deadline pass while relying on a poorly founded request, to fail to keep the proof of the notification date (it is what sets the start of every deadline), or to ask for the correction of a supposed arithmetical error that is really the judge's method of calculation.

If you have received a judgment or an order with an error, an omission or a forgotten ruling, Managora identifies the correct remedy, drafts the application and warns you of every deadline. You can order it from the service page for clarification, correction, cure and completion, with the current price.

Step by step

  1. 1

    Read the decision again with the notification in front of you(The same day as the notification)

    Pin down the exact defect (unclear sentence, wrong figure, claim left unresolved) and note the date on which it was notified to you: every deadline depends on it.

  2. 2

    Identify which remedy applies

    Unclear wording: clarification (art. 214.1). Typo, wrong name or wrong calculation: correction (art. 214.3). Omission that prevents the decision from being carried out: cure (art. 215.1). Claim raised and not decided: completion (art. 215.2). Managora does this classification for you.

  3. 3

    Check which deadline applies(2 or 5 working days depending on the remedy)

    Clarification and cure: 2 working days from notification. Completion: 5 working days. Obvious clerical errors and arithmetical errors: any time, even with a final judgment. August does not count: it is a non-working month for procedural purposes.

  4. 4

    Order the drafting of the application

    The application identifies the case file, the decision, the specific defect and the applicable article, and proposes the corrected wording. Managora drafts it from the documents you provide: the full decision and its notification.

  5. 5

    File the application with the same court

    It is filed with the body that issued the decision, never with the higher court. If a procurador is acting in the case, he or she files it electronically; if representation is not compulsory, you can file it yourself at the court's registry.

  6. 6

    The other parties are heard (completion only)(5 days for written submissions)

    In a completion under art. 215.2 LEC, the Letrado de la Administracion de Justicia passes your request to the other parties for written submissions (alegaciones).

  7. 7

    Receive the auto that decides the request(Clarification: 3 days)

    A clarification must be decided within the 3 days following the application (art. 214.2). No appeal lies against the auto granting or refusing it (arts. 214.4 and 215.5).

  8. 8

    Recalculate your deadline to appeal

    The deadline to appeal the original judgment or order starts to run on the day after notification of the auto that decided the request (art. 267.9 LOPJ). If you are going to appeal, that is your new starting point.

The four remedies in arts. 214 and 215 LEC

RemedyWhat it correctsDeadline to request itLegal basis
ClarificationUnclear or ambiguous wording in the decision2 working days from notificationArt. 214.1 and 214.2 LEC
CorrectionObvious clerical errors and arithmetical errors (typos, figures, names)At any time, even with a final judgmentArt. 214.3 LEC
CureOmissions or defects that prevent the decision from being fully carried out2 working days from notificationArt. 215.1 LEC
CompletionClaims duly raised and left undecided (incongruencia omisiva)5 working days from notificationArt. 215.2 LEC

Processing deadlines and effect on the appeal

StageDeadlineWho acts
Request for clarification or cure2 working days from notificationThe party (or the court on its own initiative)
Request for completion5 working days from notificationThe party
Written submissions by the other parties (completion only)5 daysThe other parties, once the LAJ has passed on the request
Decision on the clarification3 days from the filing of the applicationThe court or the LAJ that issued the decision
Completion on the court's own initiative5 days from when the decision is issuedThe court itself
Deadline to appeal the original decisionCounted from the day after notification of the auto that decides the requestArt. 215.5 LEC and art. 267.9 LOPJ

Clarification or completion, or an appeal?

Clarification / completion (arts. 214-215 LEC)Appeal, recurso de apelacion (art. 455 LEC)
What it correctsFormal defects: unclear wording, typos, calculations, forgotten rulingsThe merits of the case: the assessment of the evidence and the substance of the ruling
Who decidesThe same court that issued the decisionThe higher court (the Audiencia Provincial, the provincial appeal court, for civil first instance cases)
Deadline to request it2 days (clarification, cure) or 5 days (completion); clerical errors, at any time20 working days from notification (art. 458 LEC)
Official costNo tasa and no depositA deposit is required in order to appeal (disposicion adicional 15.a LOPJ, the 15th additional provision) and, where applicable, a court tasa for legal entities
Can it change the ruling?No: the decision is invariable (art. 214.1 LEC)Yes: it can overturn it in whole or in part
Effect on deadlinesIt interrupts the appeal deadline, which is counted from notification of the auto that decides the requestIt is the appeal itself: its deadline is the one that gets interrupted

Official forms and where it is filed

  • There is no official standard form: the request is a party's written application addressed to the same court that issued the decision, filed in the case file itself (by the procurador where his or her involvement is compulsory). Managora drafts it for you.

Frequently asked questions

How long does the court take to decide?

A clarification requested by a party must be decided within the 3 days following the filing of the application (art. 214.2 LEC). Completion takes a little longer: the other parties are given 5 days for written submissions (alegaciones) and the auto comes afterwards. In practice, the court's workload can stretch these periods somewhat.

What documents do I need to order the application?

Two documents: the full judgment or order, and the court notification (the record or acknowledgement proving the date on which you received it). That date is what sets the start of the 2 and 5 day deadlines.

What happens if the court refuses the clarification or the completion?

No appeal at all lies against that auto (arts. 214.4 and 215.5 LEC). But you lose nothing else: the deadline to appeal the original judgment starts to run on the day after notification of that auto, so your route to appeal stays intact.

Can I use this route to change the costs award or the amount in the ruling?

Only if it is an obvious clerical or arithmetical error, such as a sum done wrong. If what you are disputing is the judge's criterion (who is ordered to pay costs, how the compensation is calculated), that is the merits and it requires an appeal: the Tribunal Constitucional quashed a clarification order that changed an award of costs by this route (STC 185/2008).

Can I miss the appeal deadline while I wait for the answer?

In principle no: the request interrupts the appeal deadline, which is counted again from notification of the auto that decides it (art. 215.5 LEC and art. 267.9 LOPJ). That said, if the request is manifestly improper and is used only to gain time, courts can deny it that effect. A well-founded application avoids that risk.

Can a judgment that is already final be corrected?

Yes, but only obvious clerical errors and arithmetical errors, which can be corrected at any time (art. 214.3 LEC). Clarification, cure and completion have deadlines of 2 and 5 days; once they pass, the finality of the decision prevents any other change.

We handle the whole procedure for you, from start to finish.

You describe your case in a chat and sign; we file it with the Spanish authorities. Fixed price from €36.00 (21% VAT included), plus the tasa (official fee) where there is one.

See the procedure

Related procedures

The price, the tasa (official fee) and the current deadlines are on each procedure page.

Related guides