How to declare money lost to a scam on your Spanish tax return
Last updated 1 October 2026 · Reviewed by Jaime Piñeira Pardo, lawyer registered with the ICAM bar, no. 138826 · English version of our Spanish guide.
The short answer
Yes, money lost to a scam can be deducted on your tax return, but not always nor in any year. With an unknown scammer, Hacienda (the Spanish Tax Agency) allows a capital loss in the year of the scam if justified. With an identified scammer, you hold a credit right and a loss only occurs when article 14.2.k of the Ley del IRPF is met. It always goes to the general base.
We handle the whole procedure for you, from start to finish.
You describe your case in a chat and sign; we file it with the Spanish authorities. Fixed price from €157.00 (21% VAT included), plus the tasa (official fee) where there is one.
What is new, and the law that applies
- 1 July 2026: the MiCA transitional period ended in Spain. A crypto-asset platform without CNMV authorisation or an EU passport is a clear sign of a scam.
- 2025: in ruling V1096-25 the DGT admits the loss for a scam with an unknown perpetrator, allocated when it occurs and subject to justification.
- 9 October 2025: verification of the payee in euro transfers is mandatory. If the bank did not offer it or it failed, it is liable to you.
- 2024: in rulings V2493-24 and V2101-24 the DGT reiterates that, with an identified scammer, there is a credit and not a loss, and that the criminal complaint does not start the period of article 14.2.k.
- October 2026: the 2025 tax return campaign is closed; a 2025 scam not included is corrected with a rectifying self-assessment.
Can you deduct money lost to a scam on your tax return?
Yes, but you should understand what deducting means here. The scam does not provide a tax credit, nor does Hacienda refund the scammed amount. What it allows is declaring a capital loss that reduces your taxable base, and therefore the tax you pay that year and, if there is a remainder, the following four years.
The Ley del IRPF (the Spanish Personal Income Tax Act) defines capital gains and losses as variations in the value of your estate that become apparent with any alteration in its composition (article 33.1). Someone taking your money through deception fits there. What decides the case is when the loss can be allocated and how it is justified, because unjustified ones are not computed (article 33.5.a).
The Dirección General de Tributos (the Spanish Directorate General for Taxes, DGT) separates two situations in its binding rulings on online, investment and cryptocurrency scams: unknown scammer and identified scammer.
What changes if the scammer is unknown or identified?
Identified scammer (a company with a name and address, a platform with a known headquarters, a specific reported person): the DGT understands that there is no loss, but a credit right in your favour against whoever kept the money. This was stated in ruling V2493-24, regarding an online financial scam of around €114,500: the amounts paid do not give rise to the existence of a capital loss, because in principle there is a credit right against the reported party.
That credit only becomes a declarable loss when one of the circumstances of article 14.2.k of the Ley del IRPF occurs: a haircut becomes effective in a restructuring or payment agreement; the debtor is in bankruptcy and an agreement with a haircut is approved or the bankruptcy ends without you getting paid; or one year passes since the start of a judicial procedure, other than bankruptcy, aimed at executing the credit without you having been paid.
Be careful with that third scenario. In ruling V2101-24 the DGT clarifies that filing a criminal complaint for a scam is not enough to start counting the one year: it requires a judicial procedure aimed at executing the credit. In ruling V1098-20 (cryptocurrency investment through a Cyprus company, with a joint criminal complaint (querella)) it concluded that no loss could be computed yet.
Unknown scammer (the typical child in distress, untraceable phishing, a website that disappears without anyone being identified): there is no one against whom to have a credit. In ruling V1096-25, regarding a €5,050 scam with a police report, preliminary proceedings by an investigating court and a provisional dismissal until the perpetrators were found, the DGT concludes that, if the identity of the perpetrator is unknown, there is indeed a capital loss, which is allocated when the scam occurs and must be justified.
In which year do you declare a scam loss?
Capital losses are allocated to the year in which the patrimonial alteration takes place (article 14.1.c). In a scam, it depends on the scenario:
Unknown perpetrator: in the year the scam occurred. If it was in 2025 and the 2025 tax return is already filed without including it, you do not have to wait for the next one: that return is corrected.
Identified perpetrator: in the year the circumstance of article 14.2.k is met. It can be several years later, and until then there is nothing to declare. If you get the year wrong, the loss can be rejected even if it is real.
What evidence does Hacienda ask for to accept a scam loss?
The law does not set a closed list. Tax procedures are governed by the means of proof of the Civil Code and the Civil Procedure Act (article 106.1 of the Ley General Tributaria). The DGT recalls this in ruling V1096-25: you can prove the loss by any means admitted in Law, and it is the management and inspection bodies of the Tax Agency who assess whether it is enough.
In practice, the police report alone is weak evidence: it proves that you recounted some facts, not that the money has been irretrievably lost. What gives solidity to the file are the court resolutions: the preliminary proceedings opened as a result of the report and, above all, the provisional dismissal order until the perpetrators are found, which is the situation in ruling V1096-25.
Added to this is the traceability of the money: receipts of transfers or charges, statements, the bank's response to your claim, screenshots of the platform and conversations and, if they were cryptocurrencies, the wallets and the hash of each operation. Keep it as long as Hacienda can review the tax returns in which you use the loss.
Where does the scam go on the tax return and how much can you offset?
The scam loss does not come from the transfer of an asset (you did not sell anything: they took your money). That is why it does not go to the savings base, but to the general taxable base, as confirmed by the DGT in ruling V2101-24 supported by articles 45 and 48 of the Ley del IRPF.
In the general base, the loss is first offset against capital gains from the same year that do not derive from a transfer either. If the balance remains negative, it is subtracted from the positive balance of the yields and income allocations of the general base (work, economic activities or real estate capital, among others) with a limit: 25% of that positive balance (article 48.b).
What does not fit that year is offset in the following four years, for the maximum amount allowed by each one. You cannot reserve it: if there is room one year, it is applied, and after the fourth year the pending amount is lost.
Losing money in a real investment is different: if you bought real shares, funds or cryptocurrencies, they went down and you sold them at a loss, that is not a scam but a transfer loss, which goes to the savings base (article 46.b) with its own offset rules.
What if the scam involved cryptocurrencies or a fake broker?
The rules are the same. With a fake broker or a platform that does not let you withdraw, the question is whether whoever has the money can be identified: if it is an entity with a name, address and an open judicial procedure, you will be in the credit scenario; if no one can be identified, in the direct loss scenario. If cryptocurrencies were stolen from your wallet or an exchange, there is no transfer either: the loss, when applicable, goes to the general base and is calculated on what they cost you (their acquisition value), not on what they were worth on the day of the theft, which is the criterion the DGT applies to thefts (ruling V2849-19).
What you saw on the screen of the fake platform is not tax data. The DGT speaks of a loss regarding the amounts invested or paid and not recovered (ruling V2101-24): it is calculated on the money you actually sent and was not returned, not on the balance or the fictitious gains they showed you. Nor do you have to declare as a gain a profit that never existed.
From 1 July 2026, providing crypto-asset services in Spain requires authorisation from the CNMV or a passport from another EU State (MiCA Regulation). If the platform does not appear in the CNMV or ESMA registers, or requires you to pay taxes to withdraw, it is a scam and must be reported.
What happens if you later recover the scammed money?
If you recover something before declaring, only the unrecovered part is a loss. That is why the first step is to claim from the bank or the platform: what they return to you reduces the loss.
If you already declared the loss and collect later, the law resolves it for the credits of article 14.2.k: the collected amount is declared as a capital gain in the year of collection. You do not have to rectify the previous tax return: the loss was correctly declared when it was done. The same applies if the loss was from an unknown perpetrator and you later recover something: the recovered amount is declared as a gain in the year you collect it.
Distrust anyone who offers to recover the money in exchange for an upfront payment (it is usually a second scam) or anyone who assures you that you can deduct the scam without a police report or paperwork: it is foreseeable that Hacienda will reject that loss.
How does Managora help you with the scam and your tax return?
With the Claim plan after an investment, trading or cryptocurrency scam (plan_estafa_inversion file) we organise the case from day one: chronology with the evidence, letter to your bank to request the recall or chargeback, requirement to the receiving bank or exchange for the blocking and preservation of data, the police report drafted ready to file, the communication to the CNMV if the entity is not authorised and the guidance for the tax return. It does not include a criminal complaint or criminal defence, and we do not promise to recover the money: we tell you what can be claimed, from whom and in what timeframe.
With the Tax Return (modelo_100 file) we prepare and file your tax return or the rectification of the corresponding year, with the loss in the general base, the offset with the 25% limit and the pending balance for the following four years. You can see the updated amount in each file.
Step by step
- 1
Claim from the bank or platform(As soon as you detect the scam)
Request the recall of the transfer or the chargeback of the card. If you did not authorise the operation, report it without delay. What they return to you ceases to be a loss.
- 2
Report the facts(As soon as possible)
At a police station, Guardia Civil barracks or duty court, or online with ratification. Managora drafts the police report with the ordered evidence within the claim plan.
- 3
Follow the case and request copies of the resolutions(During the investigation)
Request a copy of what is issued, especially the provisional dismissal order for an unknown perpetrator: it is the most weighty evidence before the Tax Agency.
- 4
Determine which scenario you are in
Unknown perpetrator: loss in the year of the scam. Identified perpetrator: credit, and there is only a loss when article 14.2.k is met.
- 5
Calculate the amount
Add what you actually sent or were charged and subtract what was recovered. Do not count the balance or the fictitious gains of the platform.
- 6
Declare it in the modelo 100 of the corresponding year(Tax return campaign, or rectification within the 4 years of limitation)
As a capital loss that does not derive from a transfer, in the general base. If that year is already filed, with a rectifying self-assessment.
- 7
Offset the rest and keep the file(Following 4 years)
What does not fit due to the 25% limit is applied in the following four years. Keep the evidence as long as those tax returns can be reviewed.
- 8
If you recover money, declare it(Tax return of the year of collection)
If you collect after having declared the loss, the collected amount is a capital gain in the year of collection.
A worked example
A taxpayer transferred €12,000.00 in 2025 to a supposed investment platform. She reported it, the court opened preliminary proceedings and provisionally dismissed the case because the perpetrators were not identified. Her bank returned €2,000.00 to her. In 2025 the positive balance of her yields (article 48.a) is €28,000.00 and in 2026 it is €29,000.00; she has no other capital gains or losses in the general base.
- Capital loss: €12,000.00 sent minus €2,000.00 recovered = €10,000.00.
- Balance of gains and losses of the general base in 2025: −€10,000.00.
- Offset limit in 2025: 25% of €28,000.00 = €7,000.00.
- General taxable base of 2025: €28,000.00 − €7,000.00 = €21,000.00.
- Pending loss for the following four years: €10,000.00 − €7,000.00 = €3,000.00.
- Limit in 2026: 25% of €29,000.00 = €7,250.00, greater than the pending amount, so the €3,000.00 is offset.
- General taxable base of 2026: €29,000.00 − €3,000.00 = €26,000.00.
The scam reduces the general base by €7,000.00 in 2025 and by €3,000.00 in 2026: the unrecovered €10,000.00 is offset in two years. The tax savings depend on the marginal rate of each year (state and regional scale). If the 2025 tax return was already filed without the loss, it is corrected with a rectifying self-assessment.
Scam on the tax return: what is declared, when and where
| Situation | Is there a loss on the tax return? | Year it is declared | Base |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scam with unknown perpetrator (unidentifiable) | Yes, if justified | Year the scam occurred | General |
| Identified scammer or platform | No, as long as it is a pending credit | Year art. 14.2.k LIRPF is met | General |
| You have only filed a police report or criminal complaint against an identified perpetrator | Not yet (rulings V2101-24 and V1098-20) | None for now | Not applicable |
| The bank returns everything to you | No | Not applicable | Not applicable |
| The bank or platform returns a part to you | Only for the unrecovered part | According to the perpetrator scenario | General |
| Real investment that lost value and you sold | Yes, but it is not a scam | Year of the sale | Savings |
| Balance or fictitious gains of a fake platform | They do not count as a gain or a loss | Not applicable | Not applicable |
Evidence of the scam loss
| Document | What it proves | Who issues it |
|---|---|---|
| Transfer receipts or card charges and statements | That the money left your estate and how much | Your bank or payment entity |
| Response from the bank or platform to your claim | What has been recovered and what has not | The bank or platform |
| Police report | Your version of the facts and the date | Policía Nacional, Guardia Civil or court |
| Preliminary proceedings and provisional dismissal order for unknown perpetrator | That the case exists and no one has been identified | Investigating court |
| Screenshots, conversations, wallets and hash of the operations | The deception and the money trail | You (own preservation) |
Unknown or identified scammer: how the tax return changes
| Unknown perpetrator | Identified perpetrator | |
|---|---|---|
| Do you have a credit against someone? | No: there is no one against whom | Yes: against the identified person or entity |
| When is there a loss? | When the scam occurs | When art. 14.2.k is met: haircut, bankruptcy or one year of judicial execution procedure without collecting |
| Is a criminal complaint enough? | No criminal complaint is needed; you do need to justify the loss | No: the criminal complaint does not start the year of art. 14.2.k (V2101-24) |
| Most weighty evidence | Provisional dismissal order for unknown perpetrator | Resolution of the bankruptcy, the haircut or the execution procedure |
| Taxable base | General | General |
| Reference DGT ruling | V1096-25 | V2493-24, V2101-24 and V1098-20 |
Official forms and where it is filed
- Modelo 100. IRPF tax return (Renta WEB)
- Rectifying self-assessment of the modelo 100 (to include the loss in an already filed year)
- Police report to the Policía Nacional or Guardia Civil (in person, or online with ratification)
- Claim to the bank's customer service and, later, to the Banco de España
- Communication to the CNMV of an unauthorised entity or platform
Frequently asked questions
Is a police report enough to deduct a scam on my tax return?
Normally no. The police report proves that you recounted some facts, not that the money has been irretrievably lost. What carries the most weight are the court resolutions, such as the provisional dismissal order for an unknown perpetrator, together with the transfer receipts.
Can I declare the balance I saw on the fake platform as a loss?
No. The loss is the money you sent and did not recover. The balance and gains shown by the platform were fictitious: they neither add to the loss nor do they have to be declared as a gain.
Do cryptocurrencies stolen in a scam go to the savings base?
No. If they were stolen or kept by a scammer, there was no transfer: the loss, when applicable, goes to the general base and is calculated on what they cost you. Only the loss from selling real cryptocurrencies for less than they cost goes to savings.
Does deducting the scam on my tax return give me back the lost money?
No. It reduces the taxable base; the savings is the tax you stop paying on the offset part, according to your marginal rate. To recover money you have to claim from the bank, the platform or whoever has it.
I already filed the tax return for the year of the scam: can I include it now?
Yes. If the loss corresponds to a year already declared, it is corrected with a rectifying self-assessment of the modelo 100, as long as four years have not passed since the end of the filing period for that return.
I am a foreign resident in Spain: can I deduct a scam on my Spanish tax return?
Yes, if you are a tax resident in Spain and pay the IRPF, the rules are the same as for any taxpayer. If you reside in the Basque Country or Navarre, their own foral (chartered) IRPF regulations apply, which may be different.
We handle the whole procedure for you, from start to finish.
You describe your case in a chat and sign; we file it with the Spanish authorities. Fixed price from €157.00 (21% VAT included), plus the tasa (official fee) where there is one.
Related procedures
The price, the tasa (official fee) and the current deadlines are on each procedure page.
- Modelo 100: IRPF annual income tax returnWe calculate and file your IRPF (modelo 100). We cover work income, real-estate capital, movable capital, b...
- Claim plan after an investment, trading or cryptocurrency scamIf you have been scammed by a fake broker, a trading platform or a cryptocurrency scheme, we prepare the fu...
Related guides
- 401(k), IRA and Roth IRA for a resident in Spain
- Dividends and interest from foreign brokers in your Renta
- How staking, airdrops, NFTs and DeFi are taxed in Spain
- Owning a US LLC as a resident in Spain
- Receiving a foreign pension while living in Spain
- Stock options, RSUs and phantom shares: Spanish income tax
- Tax residence certificate and W-8BEN form
- The double taxation agreement between Spain and the UK
Share this guide
If you found it useful, chances are someone you know needs it right now.